The Double Empathy Problem in Neurodiverse Relationships
The Misunderstanding Goes Both Ways
The double empathy problem reframes one of the most persistent myths about autism: that autistic people lack empathy. Research shows the difficulty is mutual. Autistic and non-autistic people misread each other. Understanding why changes everything about how we interpret what goes wrong in cross-neurotype relationships.
Join from your state: Maine· Montana· Texas· New Hampshire
Sagebrush Counseling · (512) 790-0019 · contact@sagebrushcounseling.com
One of the most damaging and persistent ideas about autism is that autistic people lack empathy. It has shaped how autistic people are diagnosed, treated, and understood for decades. It has also shaped how autistic people understand themselves, often producing a specific and unnecessary kind of shame.
Affective and cognitive empathy in autismThe double empathy problem, introduced by autistic researcher Dr. Damian Milton in 2012, offers a fundamentally different account. It proposes that when autistic and non-autistic people struggle to understand each other, the difficulty is not located in the autistic person's brain alone. It is located in the interaction between two people with significantly different ways of experiencing, communicating about, and making sense of the social world. The problem is mutual. It is, by design, double.
What the Double Empathy Problem Proposes
Prior to Milton's work, the dominant explanation for autistic social difficulties was rooted in what is called theory of mind, the idea that autistic people struggle to infer the mental states, intentions, and emotions of others. This was framed as a deficit within the autistic individual and was used to explain why autistic people appear to misread social situations and struggle in interactions with neurotypical people.
Milton did not deny that autistic people experience social difficulty. What he challenged was the framing. He pointed out that the same analysis could be applied in reverse: non-autistic people are also notoriously poor at reading autistic people. They misinterpret autistic communication as rudeness, aloofness, or lack of interest. They find autistic emotional expressions hard to read. They attribute meanings to autistic behavior that the autistic person did not intend. The failure of theory of mind is not one-sided.
The double empathy problem proposes that what looks like a social deficit in autism is more accurately described as a mismatch between two different social systems. Just as someone communicating across a significant language difference is not deficient in language, an autistic person communicating across a significant neurotype difference is not deficient in social cognition. Both people are doing something cognitively difficult, and both are imperfect at it.
This reframing has significant implications. It shifts responsibility from the autistic person to the interaction. It suggests that mutual adaptation, rather than autistic correction, is the relevant therapeutic and relational goal. And it opens space for understanding autistic communication as a different system rather than a broken version of a neurotypical one.
What Crompton's Research Found
The most compelling empirical support for the double empathy problem comes from research by Dr. Catherine Crompton and colleagues, published in 2020. In a series of studies, autistic and non-autistic participants were paired in different combinations to perform tasks together and interact, and their communication effectiveness was measured.
The findings were striking. When autistic participants interacted with other autistic participants, they showed high levels of rapport and effective information transfer. Communication worked well. When non-autistic participants interacted with other non-autistic participants, their communication also worked well. The breakdown occurred specifically in mixed-neurotype pairings: autistic and non-autistic participants interacting together showed consistently lower levels of rapport and less effective communication.
This finding directly challenges the deficit model. If the difficulty were located in autistic social cognition alone, autistic-to-autistic interactions would also be impaired. They are not. The difficulty is specific to cross-neurotype interaction, which is consistent with Milton's proposal that the problem is a mismatch rather than a deficit.
Subsequent research has added further evidence. Studies have found that non-autistic observers rate autistic people more negatively in brief encounters, attributing qualities like untrustworthiness or awkwardness that autistic people do not apply to each other. This negative first-impression effect, driven by non-autistic misreading of autistic social signals, is a direct manifestation of the double empathy gap. Both sides are contributing to the misunderstanding. Only one side is typically blamed for it.
The Same Action, Two Different Reads
Select a social moment to see how the same action is sent with one meaning and received with another, in both directions across the neurotype gap.
Neither reading is wrong given their own framework. The mismatch is structural, not a failure of care or intelligence on either side.
What the Double Empathy Problem Means for Neurodiverse Couples
In a neurodiverse relationship, the double empathy problem is not an abstract concept. It is the texture of daily life. Both partners are operating with different social maps. Both are regularly misreading each other. And only one of them, typically the autistic partner, has been told that the misreading is their fault.
The Neurotypical Partner Is Also Misreading
The non-autistic partner in a neurodiverse relationship may have spent years interpreting their autistic partner's direct communication as bluntness or insensitivity, their withdrawal as rejection, their difficulty with eye contact as disinterest, their literal interpretation of social cues as obtuseness. Each of these is a misread. The autistic partner was communicating something real and genuine. The non-autistic partner received it through a framework that distorted it.
The Autistic Partner Has Been Told the Problem Is Theirs
Decades of framing autistic social difficulty as a deficit have produced a specific pattern in many autistic adults: a deep internalized belief that their way of communicating is wrong, that their social instincts are broken, and that the work of bridging the gap is entirely theirs to do. The double empathy problem challenges this directly. The work belongs to both people. The gap is produced by both neurotypes encountering each other, not by the autistic person failing to meet a neurotypical standard.
This connects directly to the post on affective and cognitive empathy in autism, which addresses the research on what autistic empathy actually is and how the alexithymia literature separates empathy from emotional recognition. The double empathy framework and the empathy research together make a strong case for approaching autistic social experience as different rather than deficient.
What Changes When Both Partners Understand This
When both partners in a neurodiverse relationship understand the double empathy problem, the narrative shifts from blame to difference. The autistic partner is not failing to be a good communicator. The non-autistic partner is not asking for too much. Both are navigating a cross-neurotype interaction with imperfect maps, and both have responsibility for the quality of the crossing. Neurodiverse couples therapy can help build the shared framework both partners need to navigate that gap with less damage and more genuine understanding.
For more on how this kind of work is approached, the post on what neurodiverse couples therapy involves covers the specifics.
Telehealth Therapy for Autistic Adults and Neurodiverse Couples Across Four States
Sagebrush Counseling offers virtual sessions via secure, HIPAA-compliant telehealth. Join from anywhere in your state.
Your Way of Communicating Was Never Broken
Understanding the double empathy problem changes what is possible in therapy and in relationships. Start with a free conversation.
Join from: Maine· Montana· Texas· New Hampshire
Frequently Asked Questions
Direct answers to what people ask most about the double empathy problem.
The double empathy problem is a theory introduced by autistic researcher Damian Milton in 2012. It proposes that the social difficulties autistic people experience with non-autistic people are not solely the result of deficits in autistic social cognition. They result from mutual misunderstanding between two groups with very different ways of experiencing and communicating about the social world. Both sides struggle to read the other. The problem is bidirectional, not one-sided.
Research by Dr. Catherine Crompton and colleagues (2020) found that autistic people communicate very effectively with other autistic people and show high levels of rapport in autistic-to-autistic interactions. Communication breakdowns occurred specifically in mixed-neurotype pairings. This directly supports the double empathy framework: if the difficulty were a deficit in autistic social cognition, autistic-to-autistic interactions would also be impaired. They are not.
No. The theory acknowledges that autistic people do experience communication differences. What it reframes is the cause. Rather than locating the difficulty entirely within the autistic person, it identifies it as arising from the interaction between two different communication systems. The autistic person is not failing at communication. They are navigating a cross-neurotype interaction with a different map from their interlocutor.
In neurodiverse relationships the double empathy problem explains why both partners often feel misunderstood even when both are trying. The neurotypical partner struggles to read their autistic partner accurately. The autistic partner struggles to navigate neurotypical indirect communication and social expectations. Neither is failing. They are operating with different maps, and the mismatch is structural. Understanding this shifts the work from autistic correction to mutual adaptation.
Both People in This Relationship Deserve to Be Understood
Neurodiverse couples therapy starts from the actual wiring of both people in the room.
Virtual sessions in: Maine · Montana · Texas · New Hampshire
Research Referenced
- Milton, D. E. M. (2012). On the ontological status of autism: the double empathy problem. Disability and Society, 27(6), 883–887. Original paper introducing the theory.
- Crompton, C. J., et al. (2020). Autistic peer-to-peer information transfer is highly effective. Autism, 24(7), 1704–1712. Foundational study demonstrating effective autistic-to-autistic communication and cross-neurotype breakdown.
- Milton, D., Gurbuz, E., & López, B. (2022). The double empathy problem: ten years on. Autism, 26(8). journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/13623613221129123
- Sasson, N. J., et al. (2017). Neurotypical peers are less willing to interact with those with autism based on thin slice judgments. Scientific Reports. Negative first-impression effects in cross-neurotype encounters.
